Harowitz & Tigerman San Francisco California Asbestos & Mesothelioma Lawyers… — Volkswagen California

1 Апр 2015 | Author: | Комментарии к записи Harowitz & Tigerman San Francisco California Asbestos & Mesothelioma Lawyers… — Volkswagen California отключены
Volkswagen California

Our Verdicts

Over the years, we obtained hundreds of millions of in settlements and verdicts for our clients. Our are too many to list, but here are examples of our jury verdicts at trial.

A $6.3 million against Allied Signal, Suzuki, and Wagner for a family who was exposed to asbestos from and brakes as a result of work by her father in the garage at home. v. Volkswagen et al.

A jury verdict of million for a Machinist Mate and Officer who served aboard in the United States Navy. The John Crane Corporation, $0 to settle this case. v. John Crane Corporation .

A $4.95 million verdict for a San Bay area shipyard worker who with packing and gaskets as a This judgment was against a who offered $0 to resolve the case. v. John Crane Corporation .

A of over $3 million for a Navy Petty Officer and Marine who worked with packing and materials which contained This verdict was against a that offered no money to the case. Taylor v. John Corporation .

A $2.8 million jury on behalf of a plant worker who at the Johns Manville facility asbestos cement pipe. verdict was against one of the fiber who provided fiber to the plant. v. Calaveras Asbestos .

A jury in excess of $2.25 million for a man who briefly in the Navy during the War. This verdict, Owens Corning Fiberglas, punitive damages to punish the for its malicious and fraudulent conduct. v. Owens Corning Fiberglas et al .

A million verdict for a warehouse who handled boxes of insulation. was, at the time, the largest award for any asbestos case in San history. Uttinger v. Owens-Illinois, Inc .

A jury verdict of $1.5 for a retired merchant seaman from disputed asbestosis. v. Owens Corning Fiberglas .


A malpractice and nursing home case in which the jury a verdict of $1.5 million. v. County USC Medical Center .

Our Results

Many times, a verdict is just half the When we obtain large it is common for defendants to appeal in an to overturn the result.

Sometimes, the law is unclear. Or new law needs to be This is where our appellate comes in. We work not only to get verdict, but to keep it. And if keeping a recovery means making new we are just as at home in the appellate as we are in the trial court.

The vast of most appellate decisions are not which means that do not apply to any other cases. when an issue is found to be this does sometimes in a published decision, which that the case acts as for all future victims. The fact our firm has so many published is part of what makes us lawyers. We are not afraid to make new law it is needed.

Volkswagen California

Richie v. Bridgestone/Firestone (1994) 22 335

Wheeler v. Raybestos-Manhattan (1992) 8 1152

Williamson v. Plant 23 Cal.App.4th 1406

Gatton v. Green Services, Inc. 64 Cal.App.4th 688

Frastaci v. Vapor (2007) 158 Cal.App.4th 1389

v. John Crane, Inc. 113 Cal.App.4th 1063

Donaldson v. Marine, Inc. (2005) 35 503

Overly v. Ingalls Shipbuilding, (1995) 74 Cal.App.4th 164

Volkswagen California
Volkswagen California
Volkswagen California
Volkswagen California

Interesting

Other articles of the category "California":

Twitter-news
Our partners
Follow us
Contact us
Our contacts

dima911@gmail.com

Born in the USSR

About this site

For all questions about advertising, please contact listed on the site.


Volkswagen all cars catalog with specifications, pictures, ratings, reviews and discusssions about cars Volkswagen.